My email is mr.leto.xavier@protonmail.me
There are two to three things you need for most submissions to the Epstein Redactions.
- A date (the latest date, usually at the top of the file, is best)
- An EFTA file name
- A short description of whats in the file, and what crime is related to the file. If the crimes mentioned violate the EFTA, please specifically cite which sections of the DOJ are violated (a link to the EFTA can be found here).
If you find a file you think should be submitted, please go to the Epstein Redactions.pdf file, hit CTRL-F, and search for the EFTA, date, or a key word in the file, to make sure that the file has not already been submitted. Many of the Epstein files available to the public through the DOJ’s website are repeated dozens of times (repeated email chains over several different data sets). I am going to double check to make sure that you submission is not already in there, but it would be a big help to me if you already did that ahead of time.
If you found a file on social media or the broader internet that is not attached to a EFTA number, that does not exclude it from being submitted. A date and a description will suffice. If you have a link to a screen cap of a text file, that would also be a big help, as we can start doing some digging around to confirm whether or not it belongs to the original EFTA.
Examples submission about redactions:
01/03/2010
EFTA02432422
Crime
Redacted co-conspirator:
Someone who “just got his visa” inviting Epstein to the 2B Riga Agency to take a look at all the “little girls” with “good bodies” at this agency.
This redaction violates Sect. 2 (a) & Sect. 2 (b)(1) of the Epstein Transparency act.
This file above is in contradiction Patel’s September 2025 hearing that Epstein had no associates help him traffic underage girls, and violating the CRM 903.—18 U.S.C. § 1001, which makes it a felony for anyone to “knowingly and willfully” falsify, conceal, or make any “false, fictitious, or fraudulent” statement or document.
– ———
For submissions about contradictory statements members of the DOJ made, they will be a little different. You will probably need two links. One link for the original statement the DOJ made regarding the Epstein files, and another link regarding contradictory events/statements being made. PLEASE only submit reputable sources. Bonus points if its both the original statement and the contradictory record are from the DOJ/FBI. Also, try to list what specific laws were broken when you make the post. If someone is lying under oath, cite the law that says lying under oath is a crime. It will help us not have to work as hard.
For example:
Mid September of 2025, Kash Patel repeated this statement, and lies under oath and testifies in a house committee hearing, saying that the FBI found no client list in their Investigation. Half a year later, in February 2026, the DOJ releases footage of an FBI sting operation from 2009 where Epstein’s former house manager, Alfredo Rodriguez, tried to sell one of Epstein’s black books to an undercover agent posing as one of the victims lawyers. Rodriguez said the book contained a lists of client names of “powerful people” as well as Epstein’s victims.
This file above is in contradiction Patel’s September 2025 hearing that the FBI did not find a “client list”, and violates the CRM 903.—18 U.S.C. § 1001, which makes it a felony for anyone to “knowingly and willfully” falsify, conceal, or make any “false, fictitious, or fraudulent” statement or document.